| ... | ... | @@ -106,6 +106,11 @@ The final results were transformed to a 2 m raster file. |
|
|
|
## Key findings
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Most vulnerable areas in the East of the studied watershed of Amman (Downtown):
|
|
|
|
highest built-up area, highest sensitivity of residents (many disadvantaged inhabitants) and many exposed areas (proximity to flood path)
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Highest adaptive capacity in the northeast and within the sub-catchment area of Marj Al Hamam:
|
|
|
|
Open space in public land available, but also on private land of wealthy residents: incentives should be created here for the private implementation of measures
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Lack of data on critical infrastructure, was compensated by OSM data, which is a promising source for data-scarce regions
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Base data on critical infrastructure, social and ecological aspects still scarce and needs to be improved for a more detailed risk and vulnerability analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Acknowledgements
|
| ... | ... | |
