Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit aefd9df6 authored by Ingram Jaccard's avatar Ingram Jaccard
Browse files

edit ms

parent 8f9ae976
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
No preview for this file type
No preview for this file type
No preview for this file type
No preview for this file type
No preview for this file type
...@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ shelter_energy_direct = round(((energy_per_source %>% filter(five_sectors == "sh ...@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ shelter_energy_direct = round(((energy_per_source %>% filter(five_sectors == "sh
``` ```
Figure 3 also shows the inequality in geographical source of the household energy and carbon footprints across final consumption sector. The shelter footprint was almost entirely domestic, with `r shelter_co2eq_direct`/`r shelter_energy_direct`% coming from direct household emissions/energy use for heating and cooling, and the rest embedded primarily along the domestic supply chain. The transport footprint was just under 2/3rds domestic. The majority of the transport footprint, above 60%, came from vehicle fuel, either burned directly or indirectly embedded along its supply chain. More than half of the transport footprint's foreign 1/3rd came from outside Europe. The manufactured goods footprint was mostly non-European, while services and food were both around half domestic. These results suggest that proposed future carbon border-adjustment mechanisms will especially impact the manufactured goods and transport footprints of the higher deciles, and to a lesser extent the food and services footprints, depending on mechanism design. Figure 3 also shows the inequality in geographical source of the household energy and carbon footprints across final consumption sector. The shelter footprint was almost entirely domestic, with `r shelter_co2eq_direct`/`r shelter_energy_direct`% coming from direct household energy use/emissions from heating and cooling, and the rest embedded primarily along the domestic supply chain. The transport footprint, on the other hand, was around 1/4 non-European. The majority of the transport footprint, above 60%, came from vehicle fuel, either directly, or indirectly embedded along its supply chain. The manufactured goods footprint was mostly non-European, while services and food were both around 1/3 non-European. These results suggest that proposed future carbon border-adjustment mechanisms will especially impact the manufactured goods and transport footprints of the higher deciles, and to a lesser extent the food and services footprints, depending on mechanism design.
# Counterfactual: a 1.5°C compatible Europe # Counterfactual: a 1.5°C compatible Europe
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment