diff --git a/analysis/figures/figure1-test.pdf b/analysis/figures/figure1-test.pdf index 610fe7f18d8c83dbfa192e778448073af08d3bff..621d6fae4a197ea9f5cb6c9b0915e4af95c6c679 100644 Binary files a/analysis/figures/figure1-test.pdf and b/analysis/figures/figure1-test.pdf differ diff --git a/analysis/figures/figure2-test.pdf b/analysis/figures/figure2-test.pdf index d59a78dd95ae1ee045f86665cdbe89fb4c2dcdef..e85a20a7eccff8bf33708cf6b95ffe759d8cfbf1 100644 Binary files a/analysis/figures/figure2-test.pdf and b/analysis/figures/figure2-test.pdf differ diff --git a/analysis/figures/figure3-test.pdf b/analysis/figures/figure3-test.pdf index e539e7cc5f681846a49c7b6dd37c5844c65ce48b..93ebbecbe21f762de61a41a165e749e3ef8dc8e9 100644 Binary files a/analysis/figures/figure3-test.pdf and b/analysis/figures/figure3-test.pdf differ diff --git a/analysis/figures/figure4-test.pdf b/analysis/figures/figure4-test.pdf index e1b8e50f0dc16aeb9e348ff9eb8bfec6beb839cd..e1dddde6df87341b037ac54a04f6a4873bef6040 100644 Binary files a/analysis/figures/figure4-test.pdf and b/analysis/figures/figure4-test.pdf differ diff --git a/analysis/figures/figure5-test.pdf b/analysis/figures/figure5-test.pdf index 2471fced79a3258cd0482a9b12f27d4cc78d7c78..b9bdece8bc857b0c29b7e6641a50d3b71961a7b1 100644 Binary files a/analysis/figures/figure5-test.pdf and b/analysis/figures/figure5-test.pdf differ diff --git a/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd b/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd index 9d88e4178fc894846787b5c40f740238cfa15c0f..cc6057eb500a75c62ccbfc587f2d8a9327f76acf 100644 --- a/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd +++ b/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ shelter_energy_direct = round(((energy_per_source %>% filter(five_sectors == "sh ``` -Figure 3 also shows the inequality in geographical source of the household energy and carbon footprints across final consumption sector. The shelter footprint was almost entirely domestic, with `r shelter_co2eq_direct`/`r shelter_energy_direct`% coming from direct household emissions/energy use for heating and cooling, and the rest embedded primarily along the domestic supply chain. The transport footprint was just under 2/3rds domestic. The majority of the transport footprint, above 60%, came from vehicle fuel, either burned directly or indirectly embedded along its supply chain. More than half of the transport footprint's foreign 1/3rd came from outside Europe. The manufactured goods footprint was mostly non-European, while services and food were both around half domestic. These results suggest that proposed future carbon border-adjustment mechanisms will especially impact the manufactured goods and transport footprints of the higher deciles, and to a lesser extent the food and services footprints, depending on mechanism design. +Figure 3 also shows the inequality in geographical source of the household energy and carbon footprints across final consumption sector. The shelter footprint was almost entirely domestic, with `r shelter_co2eq_direct`/`r shelter_energy_direct`% coming from direct household energy use/emissions from heating and cooling, and the rest embedded primarily along the domestic supply chain. The transport footprint, on the other hand, was around 1/4 non-European. The majority of the transport footprint, above 60%, came from vehicle fuel, either directly, or indirectly embedded along its supply chain. The manufactured goods footprint was mostly non-European, while services and food were both around 1/3 non-European. These results suggest that proposed future carbon border-adjustment mechanisms will especially impact the manufactured goods and transport footprints of the higher deciles, and to a lesser extent the food and services footprints, depending on mechanism design. # Counterfactual: a 1.5°C compatible Europe