edit references

analysis/paper/paper.Rmd

@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ When we situate our results within decarbonisation scenarios, we adjust the tota
 
 For example, we adjust a total final energy use of 53 GJ per capita from the LED scenario (Grubler et al. (2018) [@grubler_low_2018]), first by the household share of the total European energy footprint in 2015 (around 0.62, calculated in EXIOBASE), and then the share of total adult equivalents in the total European population in 2015 (also around 0.62, calculated using the EUROSTAT HBS, number of households per country, and population data per country): a total final energy use of 53 GJ/capita is therefore adjusted to a household final energy use of 53 GJ/adult equivalence in Europe ((53 total GJ/capita * 0.62 household share of total footprint)/0.62 adult equivalent share of population = 53 household GJ/adult equivalence). 
 
-As inequality measure through the study, we divide the value in the top European expenditure decile by that of the bottom European expenditure decile, a 10:10 ratio. For example, in expenditure, a 10:10 ratio of 5 means that adult equivalents in the top decile spend 5 times more on average than those in the bottom decile. All data and procedures are described in detail in the supplementary information (SI).
+As inequality measure through the study, we divide the value in the top European expenditure decile by that of the bottom European expenditure decile, a 10:10 ratio. For example, in expenditure, a 10:10 ratio of 5 means that adult equivalents in the top decile spend 5 times more on average than those in the bottom decile. All data and procedures are described in detail in the supplementary information (SI), and the whole analysis was performed in RStudio [@r_core_team_r:_2020 @wickham_welcome_2019].
 
 # Results