@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ Particularly in the coming phase of necessary restructuring of the European econ
Strong progressive carbon pricing could have a positive distributional effect besides its effect on absolute emission reduction [ref: MCC/Edenhofer]. In addition, other distribution and transfer instruments [@gough_recomposing_2017], such as wealth and inheritance taxes, or more progressive income taxes [@piketty_carbon_2015], will have to be discussed in order to reduce the large differences in purchasing power within and between the countries of Europe, at least as long as expenditure remains coupled to environmental footprints.
Our study highlights the challenges largely implicit in the 1.5°C scenarios with respect to securing a decent standard of living for all, and provides further evidence that achieving this dual objective likely requires a shift in the current policy focus on growth in favor of decreasing environmental impacts and increasing social equity [@haberl_systematic_2020] [ref: D’Alessandro 2020]. Although our empirical investigation is limited to countries in Europe, we contend that our main conclusions apply in a similar or stronger form to the global achievement of climate and equity goals [@hubacek_poverty_2017 @woodward_incrementum_2015 @sovacool_dispossessed_2021 @hubacek_global_2017 @kartha_carbon_2020], as articulated in the sustainable development goals.
Our study highlights the challenges largely implicit in the 1.5°C scenarios with respect to securing a decent standard of living for all, and provides further evidence that achieving this dual objective likely requires a shift in the current policy focus on growth in favor of decreasing environmental impacts and increasing social equity [@haberl_systematic_2020] [ref: D’Alessandro 2020]. Although our empirical investigation is limited to countries in Europe, we contend that our main conclusions apply in a similar or stronger form to the global achievement of climate and equity goals [@hubacek_poverty_2017 @woodward_incrementum_2015 @sovacool_dispossessed_2021 @hubacek_global_2017 @kartha_carbon_2020 @lamb_what_2020], as articulated in the sustainable development goals.
file={Full Text PDF:/home/jaccard/.mozilla/firefox/67kb6jd5.default/zotero/storage/TGWLJC9H/Akenji et al. - 2019 - 1.5-Degree Lifestyles Targets and options for red.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/home/jaccard/.mozilla/firefox/67kb6jd5.default/zotero/storage/4HCU79RD/en.html:text/html}
}
@article{lamb_what_2020,
title={What are the social outcomes of climate policies? {A} systematic map and review of the ex-post literature},
issn={1748-9326},
shorttitle={What are the social outcomes of climate policies?},
abstract={It is critical to ensure climate and energy policies are just, equitable and beneficial for communities, both to sustain public support for decarbonisation and address multifaceted societal challenges. Our objective in this article is to examine the diverse social outcomes that have resulted from climate policies, in varying contexts worldwide, over the past few decades. We review 203 ex-post climate policy assessments that analyse social outcomes in the literature. We systematically and comprehensively map out this work, identifying articles on carbon, energy and transport taxes, feed-in-tariffs, subsidies, direct procurement policies, large renewable deployment projects, and other regulatory and market-based interventions. We code each article in terms of their studied social outcomes and effects, with a focus on electricity access, energy affordability, community cohesion, employment, distributional and equity issues, livelihoods and poverty, procedural justice, subjective well-being and drudgery. Our analysis finds that climate and energy policies often fall short of delivering positive social outcomes. Nonetheless, across country contexts and policy types there are manifold examples of climate policymaking that does deliver on both social and climate goals. This requires attending to distributive and procedural justice in policy design, and making use of appropriate mechanisms to ensure that policy costs and benefits are fairly shared. We emphasize the need to further advance ex-post policy assessments and learn about what policies work for a just transition.},
language={en},
urldate={2020-10-15},
journal={Environmental Research Letters},
author={Lamb, William F. and Antal, Miklós and Bohnenberger, Katharina and Brand-Correa, Lina I. and Müller-Hansen, Finn and Jakob, Michael and Minx, Jan C. and Raiser, Kilian and Williams, Laurence and Sovacool, Benjamin K.},
year={2020},
file={IOP Full Text PDF:/home/jaccard/.mozilla/firefox/67kb6jd5.default/zotero/storage/52ZCQ837/Lamb et al. - 2020 - What are the social outcomes of climate policies .pdf:application/pdf}
