diff --git a/analysis/figures/figure3.pdf b/analysis/figures/figure3.pdf
index af23f9d10af154c5a100b65394f928a3c53c8129..e5608a4c0f08e4ed6ecbbefc3ce46c8d89fd960c 100644
Binary files a/analysis/figures/figure3.pdf and b/analysis/figures/figure3.pdf differ
diff --git a/analysis/figures/figure4.pdf b/analysis/figures/figure4.pdf
index 5945b59a09bf1691ab0605bf0681a0171bd84ed7..a7d03e2fea603db9e1df194b6f51066b620ead1f 100644
Binary files a/analysis/figures/figure4.pdf and b/analysis/figures/figure4.pdf differ
diff --git a/analysis/figures/figure5.pdf b/analysis/figures/figure5.pdf
index e9a88018801d7689029c4edfb33844ba7d68ffe7..106b0566b0009a49a87f90c4ec8f3185bf998ae5 100644
Binary files a/analysis/figures/figure5.pdf and b/analysis/figures/figure5.pdf differ
diff --git a/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd b/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd
index 1ddde3088ef0c6cb728c3178c9a9bc3a6577cd6d..709a4f5a66f6f3debd7591b5f5fe33764d9545ae 100644
--- a/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd
+++ b/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ food_energy_10_10 = round((energy_per_sector %>% filter(eu_q_rank == 10, five_se
 
 ```
 
-The final consumption sectors (mobility, food, housing, goods and services) contributed very differently to the total environmental footprint of European households in 2015 (Figure 3). On average, housing and mobility are the two largest sectors, accounting for nearly two thirds of both the energy and carbon footprints. However, there are big differences between the sectors when looking at the respective contributions of each expenditure decile. For housing there is very little difference between deciles in both the energy and the carbon footprint. The bottom four deciles even have higher carbon footprints from housing than most top deciles, which can be explained by the extreme differences in intensity shown in Figure 2. Mobility was the most unequal sector, with footprints in the top decile 10 times higher than the bottom decile, corroborating findings in [@ivanova_quantifying_2020] and [@oswald_large_2020]. Goods was the second most unequal final consumption sector (10:10 ratios around `r goods_energy_10_10` for both footprints), followed by services (10:10 ratios of `r services_energy_10_10` for energy and `r services_co2eq_10_10` for carbon) and then food (10:10 ratios of `r food_energy_10_10` for both footprints).
+The final consumption sectors (housing, mobility, food, goods, and services) contributed very differently to the total environmental footprint of European households in 2015 (Figure 3). On average, housing and mobility are the two largest sectors, accounting for nearly two thirds of both the energy and carbon footprints. However, there are big differences between the sectors when looking at the respective contributions of each expenditure decile. For housing there is very little difference between deciles in both the energy and the carbon footprint. The bottom four deciles even have higher carbon footprints from housing than most top deciles, which can be explained by the extreme differences in intensity shown in Figure 2. Mobility was the most unequal sector, with footprints in the top decile 10 times higher than the bottom decile, corroborating findings in [@ivanova_quantifying_2020] and [@oswald_large_2020]. Goods was the second most unequal final consumption sector (10:10 ratios around `r goods_energy_10_10` for both footprints), followed by services (10:10 ratios of `r services_energy_10_10` for energy and `r services_co2eq_10_10` for carbon) and then food (10:10 ratios of `r food_energy_10_10` for both footprints).
 
 ```{r figure3, out.width="100%", fig.cap="Energy and carbon footprints by final consumption sector and European expenditure decile in 2015, further broken down by emission source location."}
 knitr::include_graphics(here::here("analysis", "figures", "figure3.pdf"))
diff --git a/analysis/paper/paper.docx b/analysis/paper/paper.docx
index a88e511ef32f0a8738e0a667ae4a74a1e5922ae0..d8c82aedc4080364f904a70bcfa67553f7d4e19e 100644
Binary files a/analysis/paper/paper.docx and b/analysis/paper/paper.docx differ