From e986d98dadeab031915b3542ce2ebf0e0a7612f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jaccard <jaccard@pik-potsdam.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:51:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] edit ms

---
 analysis/paper/paper.Rmd | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd b/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd
index 8bdb23d..72ba3b0 100644
--- a/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd
+++ b/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd
@@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ Figure 3 also shows the inequality in geographical source of the household energ
 
 # Counterfactual: a 1.5°C compatible Europe
 
-Global 1.5°C compatible decarbonisation scenarios achieve a similar climate outcome with different assumptions about the transformation of energy supply and demand, from renewable capacity, deployment of carbon-capture-and-storage (CCS), to socio-technological demand transformation. Table 1 shows some final energy use results from six different decarbonisation scenarios, already adjusted from total GJ/capita to household GJ/adult equivalence. The original total GJ/capita scenario results are from different world regions (OECD, West EU, Global North, and Global), depending on the regional disaggregation of the publicly available scenario results, and so should not be interpreted as perfectly comparable with each other. For the purposes of our study, however, we are simply interested in the range of scenario results within which to situate our household footprint results, presented below in the ‘Inequality in a 1.5°C compatible Europe’ section and Figure 5.  
+Global 1.5°C compatible decarbonisation scenarios achieve a similar climate outcome with different assumptions about the transformation of energy supply and demand, from renewable capacity, deployment of carbon-capture-and-storage (CCS), to socio-technological demand transformation. Table 1 shows some final energy use results for the year 2050 from six different decarbonisation scenarios, already adjusted from total GJ/capita to household GJ/adult equivalence. The original total GJ/capita scenario results are from different world regions (OECD, West EU, Global North, and Global), depending on the regional disaggregation of the publicly available scenario results, and so should not be interpreted as perfectly comparable with each other. For the purposes of our study, however, we are simply interested in the range of scenario results within which to situate our household footprint results, presented below in the ‘Inequality in a 1.5°C compatible Europe’ section and Figure 5.  
 
 ```{r}
 
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ library(flextable)
 flextable(df_scenario_info) %>%
   autofit() %>%
   set_header_labels(scenario = "scenario", 
-                    fe_gj_aeu = "final energy: household GJ/adult equivalence") %>%
+                    fe_gj_aeu = "final energy in 2050: household GJ/adult equivalence") %>%
   set_caption("Decarbonisation scenarios.") %>%
   width(width = 3) 
 ```
-- 
GitLab