From 89c60b27094be06e250b862e5c3aeb725c6807cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jaccard <jaccard@pik-potsdam.de> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:57:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] edit ms --- analysis/paper/paper.Rmd | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd b/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd index 3d2ec61..c1a7e5b 100644 --- a/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd +++ b/analysis/paper/paper.Rmd @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ If this dual objective is taken seriously in European climate policy, then there In 2016, the average energy footprint of EU citizens was X Gj and the carbon footprint X tonnes CO2e per capita [@ivanova_mapping_2017]. However, the differences in average energy and carbon footprints are large within and between different regions in the EU. Energy footprints ranged from X to Y in 2016 [@oswald_large_2020] and carbon footprints between X and Y in the same year [@ivanova_mapping_2017]. Depending on the assumptions of different global mitigation scenarios, the average footprints need to be reduced to between X and Y GJ or X and Y tCO2e per capita by 2050, respectively. -We assess under what conditions European energy inequality is compatible with the achievement of global climate goals and a decent standard of living following these steps. We first construct common European expenditure deciles based on national income stratified household expenditure data covering 30 European countries, further stratified by 5 consumption sectors. We then calculate average household GHG and energy footprints per European expenditure decile and consumption sector to explore the current structure of energy and carbon intensities across these categories. Based on these results, we use the current empirical per sector best technology to calculate a homogenized counterfactual European household energy demand distribution (and associated emissions) at current European consumption levels. We report energy and emissions savings per expenditure decile and country and relate the resulting energy demand to available supply across different global 1.5°C scenarios from the literature. Using assumptions on decent living energy demand and available energy supply from different 1.5°C scenarios show how the homogenized European energy demand distribution would need to be transformed (flattened) to conform to these constraints. We report exemplary implications for energy use in different expenditure deciles. we discuss implications for policy (GND, doughnut etc) and whatnot, and additional line of inquiry: how much of those emissions is non-eu? +We assess under what conditions European energy inequality is compatible with the achievement of global climate goals and a decent standard of living following these steps. We first construct common European expenditure deciles based on national income stratified household expenditure data covering 30 European countries, further stratified by 5 consumption sectors. We then calculate average household GHG and energy footprints per European expenditure decile and consumption sector to explore the current structure of energy and carbon intensities across these categories. Based on these results, we use the current empirical per sector best technology to calculate a homogenized counterfactual European household energy demand distribution (and associated emissions) at current European consumption levels. We report energy and emissions savings per expenditure decile and country and relate the resulting energy demand to available supply across different global 1.5°C scenarios from the literature. Using assumptions on decent living energy demand and available energy supply from different 1.5°C scenarios show how the homogenized European energy demand distribution would need to be transformed (flattened) to conform to these constraints. We report exemplary implications for energy use in different expenditure deciles. Finally, we discuss implications for policy (GND, doughnut, carbon border adjustment mechanism for non-eu emissions). # Materials and methods -- GitLab