|
|
h1. N2O emission from nitrification
|
|
|
h1. Bayesian uncertainty analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Math markup
|
|
|
{{>toc}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is some math markup: $`a^2 + b^2 = c^2`$
|
|
|
h2. Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or more complicated:
|
|
|
$`\sum_{i=1}^n i^3 = \left( \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \right)^2`$
|
|
|
$x^{yield}_{t}$
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's based on $`\KaTeX`$
|
|
|
Parameter determination for processes in LPJmL is mostly achieved by
|
|
|
literature values. In case, data are available, the estimation of
|
|
|
uncertainties and evaluation of current parameterization is possible by
|
|
|
Bayesian analysis. Here, we give an example how to use data for a better
|
|
|
grass parametrization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
# GitLab-specific markup
|
|
|
I can refer to a specific commit, just by pasting the hash here: b3ede2e52b64026c68d90519d93b3bce58f4c46d
|
|
|
h2. Details
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or here: 80fbf7b1627d45d8d857481585d23430fb9b354b
|
|
|
a more detailed description of it (data sources, data preparation,
|
|
|
meaning, usage...). Refer to references if you have any using
|
|
|
footnotes\[1\]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can refer to an issue, starting with the $`#`$: #2
|
|
|
h2. Technical Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is another wiki page about [Something Else](something-else)
|
|
|
What you need are \* data \* the R package FME\[1\]
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Another heading
|
|
|
- [ ] a task
|
|
|
- [x] a completed task
|
|
|
Following the procedure there, you can \* define a cost function that
|
|
|
gives the deviation of the model output from the observations \*
|
|
|
determine the local sensitivity to a large set of parameters \* evaluate
|
|
|
the most prominent parameters that should be included in the Monte Carlo
|
|
|
simulations by determining the collinearity \* fit the model to the data
|
|
|
using the chosen subset of parameters \* perform the Markov chain
|
|
|
Monte-Carlo simulations \* evaluate the uncertainty of the model output
|
|
|
due to the parameter values accepted in the Monte Carlo chain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
========================================
|
|
|
h2. Developer(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# h1
|
|
|
Susanne Rolinski, Anja Rammig, Werner von Bloh
|
|
|
|
|
|
# N2O emission from nitrification
|
|
|
h2. See Also
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Parton et al. 1996":http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/96GB01455/abstract gives function
|
|
|
\[\[Upscaling\]\], \[\[Downscaling\]\], \[\[Wiki\]\], \[\[Mathematical
|
|
|
Description\]\], \[\[Missing wiki page\]\]
|
|
|
|
|
|
$`N_{N2O} = N_{H2O} \cdot N_{pH} \cdot N_T \cdot (Kmx + Nmx \cdot N_{NH4})`$
|
|
|
Links to other Wiki pages, that are related. It doesn't matter if the
|
|
|
wiki page already exists or not. Also link pages that do not exist yet!
|
|
|
Links to existing pages are written blue, links to non-existing pages
|
|
|
are writtn in red.
|
|
|
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
$N_{N2O} = ((WFPS-b)/(a-b))^{d\cdot (b-a)/(a-c)} \cdot ((WFPS-c)/(a-c))^d$
|
|
|
* $WFPS$ is water filled pore space of the soil
|
|
|
* parameters $a$ to $d$ given for sandy and medium soil
|
|
|
* source for functions given as Doran et al. 1988
|
|
|
h2. References
|
|
|
|
|
|
$N_{pH} = 0.56+1/\pi\cdot \arctan(\pi\cdot 0.45 \cdot(pH-5))$
|
|
|
* we ignore this limitation
|
|
|
|
|
|
$N_T = -0.06+0.13\cdot \exp(0.07 \cdot T_{soil})$
|
|
|
* based on data by Sabey et al. (1959)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$Kmx = 0.00038$ gN m$^{-2}$ d$^{-1}$
|
|
|
* N turnover coefficient
|
|
|
* site specific but given for different sites
|
|
|
* for natural soils given as 3.8 and 3.9 (gN ha$^{-1}$ d$^{-1}$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$Nmx = 0.003$ gN m$^{-2}$ d$^{-1}$
|
|
|
* maximum nitrification flux of N$_2$O with excess NH$_4$.
|
|
|
|
|
|
$N_{NH4} = 1 - \exp(-0.0105\cdot NH4)$
|
|
|
* NH4 here given as $\mu$g N per g soil
|
|
|
* in the same range as gN m$^{-2}$ so that formula taken as it is
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process is incorporated in source:branches/nitrogen_rev2142/src/soil/littersom.c after mineralization. |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
|
|
fn1. K. Soetaert and T. Petzoldt (2010): Inverse Modelling, Sensitivity
|
|
|
and Monte Carlo Analysis in R Using Package FME. Journal of Statistical
|
|
|
Software, 33, 3, 1-28. |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |