Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
R
remind
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 19
    • Issues 19
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Redmine
    • Redmine
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Jerome Hilaire
  • remind
  • Issues
  • #52

Closed
Open
Created Feb 03, 2020 by Michaja Pehl@pehlContributor

Is there a legitimate reason for everybody and his brother being part of `enty`?

enty used to be "energy type" and encompass primary, secondary, and final energy (pety, sety, fety). Now it includes useful energy, a gazillion emissions, peog as an oil-and gas aggregate, as well as the good and perm tradable assets. Is there a legitimate case where they all have to be in the same set? Because that's blowing up all the variables and parameters involved and is quite confusing from time to time.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None